ADSM-L

Re: Empty volume does not return to scratch?

2003-07-29 06:29:15
Subject: Re: Empty volume does not return to scratch?
From: Rick Harderwijk <rharderwijk AT FACTOTUMMEDIA DOT NL>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:31:51 +0200
Remco,

I missed the discussion, but this is what the output you gave said:

tsm: BASKET>q vol stat=empty f=d


                 Volume Status: Empty
                        Access: Read/Write
        Pct. Reclaimable Space: 0.0
-->>           Scratch Volume?: Yes                <<--
               In Error State?: No

Am I missing something here?

Regards,

Rick

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Remco Post [mailto:r.post AT SARA DOT NL]
Verzonden: 29 juli 2003 12:12
Aan: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Onderwerp: Empty volume does not return to scratch?


Hi all,

a few weeks back we had a discussion on empty volumes not returning to
scratch, well, here is an example.

tsm: BASKET>q vol stat=empty f=d

                   Volume Name: U00122
             Storage Pool Name: SANPOOL
             Device Class Name: 3494-3590
       Estimated Capacity (MB): 0.0
                      Pct Util: 0.0
                 Volume Status: Empty
                        Access: Read/Write
        Pct. Reclaimable Space: 0.0
               Scratch Volume?: Yes
               In Error State?: No
      Number of Writable Sides: 1
       Number of Times Mounted: 5
             Write Pass Number: 0
     Approx. Date Last Written:
        Approx. Date Last Read:
           Date Became Pending:
        Number of Write Errors: 0
         Number of Read Errors: 0
               Volume Location:
Last Update by (administrator):
         Last Update Date/Time: 07/27/03   11:11:32

This is with server level 5.1.6.4 on AIX 4.3.3.

What is more surprising is that the last update of this volume was not
reclamation, but allocation of this volume in the storagepool. It has been
mounted for over two hours at that time, probably due to space-recamation
running at that time, but apperently, there was never one bit written. Now
I'm wondering, how could that be? The actlog shows:

07/27/03   11:11:32      ANR8337I 3590 volume U00122 mounted in drive 3590-6
                          (/dev/rmt6).
07/27/03   11:11:32      ANR1340I Scratch volume U00122 is now defined in
storage
                          pool SANPOOL.
07/27/03   11:11:58      ANE4991I (Session: 12641, Node: BASKET-C)  API
ANE4991
                          rmt0=leeg rmt1=leeg rmt2=leeg rmt3=leeg rmt4=leeg
                          rmt5=leeg rmt6=U00122
(lots more ANE4991I here, this is generated by a applcation developped in
house....)
07/27/03   13:17:37      ANR8325I Dismounting volume U00122 - 2 minute mount
                          retention expired.
07/27/03   13:17:38      ANE4991I (Session: 12911, Node: BASKET-C)  API
ANE4991
                          rmt0=leeg rmt1=000809 rmt2=000689 rmt3=leeg
rmt4=leeg
                          rmt5=U00261 rmt6=U00122
07/27/03   13:17:49      ANR8336I Verifying label of 3590 volume U00122 in
drive
                          3590-6 (/dev/rmt6).
07/27/03   13:18:44      ANE4991I (Session: 12913, Node: BASKET-C)  API
ANE4991
                          rmt0=leeg rmt1=000809 rmt2=000689 rmt3=leeg
rmt4=leeg
                          rmt5=U00261 rmt6=U00122
07/27/03   13:18:47      ANR8468I 3590 volume U00122 dismounted from drive
3590-6
                          (/dev/rmt6) in library 3494LIB.


And the volume doesn't show in the actlog ever since...

As you can see, the is a volume that was a scratch vol, was written to
(apperently, it could not have been read, since scratchvolumes don't contain
any data) for over 2 hours and is empty afterwards.


--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post

SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdam    http://www.sara.nl
High Performance Computing  Tel. +31 20 592 8008    Fax. +31 20 668 3167

"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer
industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry
didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>