Re: 5.2 bug?
2003-07-21 10:03:19
Remeta, Mark wrote:
Search within: United States Worldwide
Advanced search Tips
No results found
Maybe your going to a different www.ibm.com...
Or maybe it's case-sensitive? Worked for me.
This is the noisiest list I have ever been on. Has anyone given any thought to
splitting this into client/server questions and by IBM-OS/Win/Other, perhaps by
instituting a filterable naming convention? And another category for generics
Q/A/rants? For all but the full-time TSM administrator (and for many of them)
this might be the only way to overcome the unfavorable signal-to-noise ratio.
If that doesn't fly, I'm either going to the digest or dropping out altogether.
While there are some very knowledgeable and helpful people here, it is a scary
thought to me that there are so many people responsible for enterprise backup
and restore who cannot or will not spend five minutes to RTFM or design a brief
test. Or who think that the four minutes they save by posting instead is more
valuable than the five-ten seconds it takes to scan their query, recognize it
and delete it - multiplied by hundreds of list participants.
</soapbox off>
Dan Goodman
Systems Engineer Specialist
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
215-503-6808
<Daniel.Goodman AT mail.tju.edu>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: 5.2 bug?, (continued)
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Remeta, Mark
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Richard Sims
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Jolliff, Dale
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Remeta, Mark
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Richard Sims
- Re: 5.2 bug?,
Dan Goodman <=
- Re: 5.2 bug?, Tom Kauffman
|
|
|