ADSM-L

Re: ANR9999D bfcreate.c(1906)

2003-07-11 07:51:33
Subject: Re: ANR9999D bfcreate.c(1906)
From: Henrik Wahlstedt <shwl AT STATOIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:50:44 +0200
It struck my mind, client versions...

If I dont use DIRMC in  my opt-file, the scheduled backup runs fine.

Tivoli might have an interresting article about this but I´m locked out
from their website at the moment.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q=Destination+switched&uid=swg21110948&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en




Med vänlig hälsning
                                                                                
    
                                                                                
    
                                                                                
    
 Henrik Wahlstedt          Statoil                   Phone: +46 8 429 6325      
    
 KTJ IT NED SE1            Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24  Mobile: +46 70 429 6325    
    
                           118 88 Stockholm          E-mail:                    
    
                           Sverige                   Henrik.Wahlstedt AT 
statoil DOT com   
                                                                                
    




                                                                                
                                   
                    Richard Sims                                                
                                   
                    <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>         To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT 
EDU                                              
                    Sent by:             cc:     (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)        
                                   
                    "ADSM: Dist          Subject:     Re: ANR9999D 
bfcreate.c(1906)                                
                    Stor Manager"                                               
                                   
                    <ADSM-L AT VM DOT MA                                        
                                          
                    RIST.EDU>                                                   
                                   
                                                                                
                                   
                                                                                
                                   
                    2003-07-11                                                  
                                   
                    13:42                                                       
                                   
                    Please                                                      
                                   
                    respond to                                                  
                                   
                    "ADSM: Dist                                                 
                                   
                    Stor Manager"                                               
                                   
                                                                                
                                   
                                                                                
                                   




>I coulnt find any usefull on my search, even if the problem is mentioned
>before.  Do you have clue why this happens?
>
>07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANR9999D bfcreate.c(1918): ThreadId<60> Destination
>                    switched from DIRECTORYPOOL to BACKUPPOOL2 in the
middle
>                    of  a transaction.
>07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 2106 for node
>                    STO-SQL10 (WinNT) - internal server error detected.
>
>Both stgpools are on disk.
>
>The problem started after my TSM server upgrade from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.7.0
>Two of 20 NT4 servers, 3.1.0.8,  have this problem.

Henrik - I believe this occurred because your server upgrade finally put
the
         server "out of the reach" of the antiquated client.
As IBM says, they support only recent mixes of client and server
version/releases, with anything outside that span being untested and
"unsupported".  You can only keep an old client version around for so long.

  Richard Sims, BU





-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>