Hi
Does anyone use TDP for Domino backing up ZFS files ?
I am testing performance for ZFS as against HFS and find ZFS some 8-12%
slower when running a domdsmc sel command.
Our environment :
Zos 1.1
Zos TSM Server 4.2.3.0
TDP/Domino 1.1.2.0
TSM OEMVS Client 4.2.1.0
We took a sample 5000 cylinder HFS file about 54% utilised and copied the
data to test HFS and ZFS files.
Here are some sample results from TDP/Domino backups :
Commands in both cases were :
domdsmc sel "mailst/*" /subd=yes >>
/etc/tsm/domino/m01/backups/£MAILDIR.log
HFS :
Total Domino databases inspected: 53
Total Domino databases backed up: 53
Total Domino databases excluded: 0
Throughput rate: 7,385.72 Kb/Sec
Total bytes transferred: 1,990,998,528
Elapsed processing time: 263.26 Secs
ZFS :
Total Domino databases inspected: 53
Total Domino databases backed up: 53
Total Domino databases excluded: 0
Throughput rate: 6,488.06 Kb/Sec
Total bytes transferred: 1,990,998,528
Elapsed processing time: 299.68 Secs
ZFS are allocated as per recommendations in Red Book ZFS Implementation
SG246580
As far as Domino functions go, ZFS is far superior in performance to HFS;
from the TSM side we see the opposite.
Does anyone else have this experience ?
Thanks
Robin Lowe
Senior Storage Analyst
Storage Management Team
For more information on Standard Life, visit our website
http://www.standardlife.com/
The Standard Life Assurance Company, Standard Life House, 30 Lothian Road,
Edinburgh EH1 2DH, is registered in Scotland (No. SZ4) and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority. Tel: 0131 225 2552 - calls may be recorded or
monitored. This confidential e-mail is for the addressee only. If received
in error, do not retain/copy/disclose it without our consent and please
return it to us. We virus scan and monitor all e-mails but are not
responsible for any damage caused by a virus or alteration by a third party
after it is sent.
|