Re: SUN F6800's
2003-05-06 14:33:59
Scalability is much easier to handle if you think in terms of several
smaller TSM servers.
Sharing a library in such an arrangment is possible, but in a large
environment, tape drive throughput becomes an issue. Consider a separate
library for each TSM server, or possible a large disk farm for a primary
pool and a shared library for the offsite storage pool. (Hi, Scott!)
yeah listen to mark and the other guy, they are correct and know a lot
more than me. same backplane IO wise so better to have many, than one.
--
Scott Walters
Packet Pusher - "The world speaks IP"
Mack Trucks, WHQ http://www.MackTrucks.com
2100 Mack Boulevard Ph: 610.709.3728
Allentown, PA 18103 Fx: 610.709.2809
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- SUN F6800's, Reiss David IT751 (ext-CDI)
- Re: SUN F6800's, Cowperthwaite, Eric
- Re: SUN F6800's, Reiss David IT751 (ext-CDI)
- Re: SUN F6800's, Cowperthwaite, Eric
- Re: SUN F6800's, Stapleton, Mark
- Re: SUN F6800's,
Scott Walters <=
- Re: SUN F6800's, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
- Re: SUN F6800's, Seay, Paul
- Re: SUN F6800's, Cowperthwaite, Eric
|
|
|