ADSM-L

Re: SUN F6800's

2003-05-06 14:33:59
Subject: Re: SUN F6800's
From: Scott Walters <scott_walters AT MACKTRUCKS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 14:33:31 -0400

Scalability is much easier to handle if you think in terms of several
smaller TSM servers.

Sharing a library in such an arrangment is possible, but in a large
environment, tape drive throughput becomes an issue. Consider a separate
library for each TSM server, or possible a large disk farm for a primary
pool and a shared library for the offsite storage pool. (Hi, Scott!)


yeah listen to mark and the other guy, they are correct and know a lot
more than me.  same backplane IO wise so better to have many, than one.




--
Scott Walters
Packet Pusher - "The world speaks IP"

Mack Trucks, WHQ        http://www.MackTrucks.com
2100 Mack Boulevard     Ph: 610.709.3728
Allentown, PA 18103     Fx: 610.709.2809

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>