ADSM-L

Re: TDP for Domino

2003-04-28 08:26:51
Subject: Re: TDP for Domino
From: "Brian L. Nick" <BRIAN.NICK AT PHOENIXWM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:18:33 -0400
Shannon,

 What server level are you running? We have found an issue with TSM 4.2.1.9
on OS/390 2.10 where it is not resolving quotation marks properly. Fix is
to upgrade to 5.1.  Which we have not done yet due to cost. Management is
actually looking at the possibility of moving off of TSM due to the new 5.1
licensing models.


 - Brian



Brian L. Nick
Systems Technician - Storage Solutions
The Phoenix Companies Inc.
100 Bright Meadow Blvd
Enfield CT. 06082-1900

E-MAIL:  Brian.Nick AT phoenixwm DOT com
PHONE:   (860)403-2281




                   "Del Hoobler"
                   <[email protected]        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
                   BM.COM>              cc:
                   Sent by:             Subject:     Re: TDP for Domino
                   "ADSM: Dist
                   Stor Manager"
                   <ADSM-L AT VM DOT MA
                   RIST.EDU>


                   04/28/03
                   08:05 AM
                   Please
                   respond to
                   "ADSM: Dist
                   Stor Manager"






Shannon,

The first thing that comes to mind is that
your path name has spaces in it, so you should
specify the "OBJECTS" parameter with two sets
of quotes (so one set it maintained when it is
sent to the client.)

For example, to update your schedule:
(multiple lines shown should all be entered
as one command.)

UPDATE SCHEDULE MGE_DOMINO DOM_SELECT_WKLY
   OBJECTS='"c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\domino\domsel.cmd"'

Please note the two sets of quotes around the OBJECTS
parameter.

Thanks,

Del

----------------------------------------------------

Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
hoobler AT us.ibm DOT com

- Remember that the best job security is
doing a job well and doing it cheerfully.

=====================================================
> We are in the process of implementing TDP for Mail (Lotus Domino), which
is on a W2K client.  > TSM server is OS/390 MVS 2.10.  This client already
has the backup client installed so we
> installed the 5.1.5 TDP client & API.  I created a separate Domain just
for the TDP and
> registered it's own node and management class etc.  Everything seem to go
OK until I
> scheduled a selective backup test from the server schedule.  It is as
follows;
> DOM_SELECT_WKLY - Properties
> ----------------------------
> Policy domain                  : MGE_DOMINO
> Schedule name                  : DOM_SELECT_WKLY
> Description                    : Weekly selective backup of Notes2 Domino
databases
> Last update by                 : SBACH
> Last update date/time          : 04/25/2003 15:45:12
> Associated n&odes              : NOTES2_TDP
> Overriding client options      :
> Objects                        : c:\program
files\tivoli\tsm\domino\domsel.cmd
> Action                         : COMMAND
> &Start date                    : 4/25/2004
> Start time                     : 16:25
> Length of startup window       : 3 HOURS
> Period between startup windows : 1 WEEKS
> &Day of the week               : FRIDAY
> Priority                       : 2
> &Expiration date               : Never





***********************************************************************************
 CONFIDENTIAL: This communication, including attachments, is intended only for 
the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or 
privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that you have received this document in error, and any use, review, 
copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by 
return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy any and all copies of this 
communication.

***********************************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>