I think any aggregates that have deleted files in them are still counted as
whole.  So, if reclamation ever runs against the primary and any copy pools
it is highly likely some aggregates in one pool would be reclaimed and in
others they may not.  The other possibility is you have more than one
primary pool which has had a backup stgpool command to the copy pool.

Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Northrop Grumman Information Technology
757-688-8180


-----Original Message-----
From: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:Arnaud.Brion AT PANALPINA DOT COM]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:25 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Occupancy from copy_pool > primary_pool ??


Hi* SM'ers,

Could anybody explain me how it is possible that following query : "select
sum (physical_mb), sum (logical_mb), stgpool_name from occupancy group by
stgpool_name" shows me copy-pools occupation bigger than primary pools ? I
first thought it could be related to space reclamation process, but when I
ran that query all reclamation processes where allready finished (same
thresholds for both primary and copy pools), so I'm stuck :-( Anybody
willing to shed  some light on me ? Thanks in advance.

Arnaud

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group     |
| Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland |
| Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01       |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=