ADSM-L

Re: TSM server on Linux w/3494-3590

2003-01-29 11:26:17
Subject: Re: TSM server on Linux w/3494-3590
From: Daniel Sparrman <daniel.sparrman AT EXIST DOT SE>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:25:17 +0100
Hi

We have Linux running on two sites. 

The Linux server is fairly good in performance, but I would consider it 
for a mid-sized platform. The I/O and processor architecture of the x86 on 
which you run the TSM server will have I/O constraints when having 
environments with a daily incremental >200GB each night. Also, looking at 
x86 boxes today, the PCI architecure cannot really compete with UNIX 
boxes. Normally, the UNIX boxes has a lot more PCI-buses, which is a 
requirement when running multiple FC adapters to tape and disk.

Also, I would consider a fairly large UNIX box a lot more stable than 
running on a x86 box, when it comes to error detection, processor handling 
and redundancy.

Best Regards

Daniel Sparrman
-----------------------------------
Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Propellervägen 6B
183 62 HÄGERNÄS
Växel: 08 - 754 98 00
Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51




"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
2003-01-29 17:13
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: TSM server on Linux w/3494-3590


Hi Zoltan!
I'm not an expert, but is the x86 bus architecture not a bottleneck for 
high
volume high performance I/O?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


-----Original Message-----
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:zforray AT VCU DOT EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 17:16
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: TSM server on Linux w/3494-3590


We are investigating the issue of moving TSM off AIX to a Linux system,
purely due to the cost of AIX hardware (lets face it....when it costs me
$5000 for a drawer of used SSA drives just to get me 130GB of raided disk
when I can get complete multi-processor x86 boxes with 300GB of raided
disk for the same cost, you have to investigate !)


The only issue is the fiber-channel/SAN connectivity to the shared 3494
ATL (primarily used by our z/OS systems) using 3590 E1A drives.

Can this be accomplished with an x86 box ?

How many folks are using the fairly new Linux version of TSM ?   How is it
running ?    Issues ?


**********************************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged 
material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, 
you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If 
you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender 
immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke 
Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees 
shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this 
e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
**********************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>