ADSM-L

Re: At what level does the 4.2.x server have the session count fi x?

2003-01-28 14:34:08
Subject: Re: At what level does the 4.2.x server have the session count fi x?
From: "Jolliff, Dale" <xjolliff AT TI DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 13:31:40 -0600
Thank you, sir.
How long has 4.2.3.2 been out?
Anyone else have it in production?
_Heavy_ production?

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:storman AT US.IBM DOT COM]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:26 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: At what level does the 4.2.x server have the session count
fix?


I don't work on the TSM server, so take this with the appropriate grain of
salt...

1) The summary table problem you are seeing is probably related to APARs
IC33840 (server) and IC34693 (client). This is really one problem, but we
have two APARs because both client and server needed to be changed to fix
this. You'll need server version 4.2.3.2 and client version 5.1.5.2 (or
up) to get the fixes.

2) The 65K session count issue is probably APAR IC35151, also fixed in
server version 4.2.3.2.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.eyebm DOT com (change eye to i to reply)

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.




"Jolliff, Dale" <xjolliff AT TI DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
01/28/2003 11:15
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: At what level does the 4.2.x server have the
session count fi x?



Not sure when it cropped up, but I'm on 4.2.3.0 on Solaris and AIX and we
have to recycle the server before 65k session count or we get hundreds of
9999D's per hour.

There is also another issue with the summary table where certain client
versions can't update the summary table on certain fields which produces
9999D's also.


01/28/03   11:26:29      ANR9999D smnode.c(18972): ThreadId<40> Session
exiting
has
                          no affinityId cluster

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40) Context report

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40) Thread AcceptorThread (33) is a parent
thread
related
                          to: 40

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33) Generating TM Context Report:
(struct=tmTxnDesc)
                          (slots=256)

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33)  *** no transactions found ***

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33) Generating Database Transaction Table
Context:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33)  *** no transactions found ***

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33) Generating SM Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33)  *** no sessions found ***

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33) Generating AS Vol Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33)  No mounted (or mount in progress) volumes.

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33) Generating ssSession Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33)  No storage service sessions active.

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33) Generating ssOpenSeg Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33)  No storage service segments found.

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33) Generating BF Copy Control Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (33)  No global copy control blocks.

01/28/03   11:26:29

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40) SessionThread : ANR9999D calling thread

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40) Generating TM Context Report:
(struct=tmTxnDesc)
                          (slots=256)

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)  *** no transactions found ***

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40) Generating Database Transaction Table
Context:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)  *** no transactions found ***

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40) Generating SM Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40) Session 66145:    Type=Node,   Id=DLEAG

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)   Platform=SUN SOLARIS, NodeId=210,
Owner=oracle
01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)   SessType=4, Index=6, TermReason=0

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)   RecvWaitTime=0.000  (samples=0)

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)   Backup  Objects ( bytes )  Inserted: 0 (
0.0
)
01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)   Backup  Objects ( bytes )  Restored: 0 (
0.0
)
01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)   Archive Objects ( bytes )  Inserted: 0 (
0.0
)
01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)   Archive Objects ( bytes ) Retrieved: 0 (
0.0
)
01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)   Last Verb ( SignOff ), Last Verb State (
Recv )
01/28/03   11:26:29      (40) Generating AS Vol Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)  No mounted (or mount in progress) volumes.

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40) Generating ssSession Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:29      (40)  No storage service sessions active.

01/28/03   11:26:30      (40) Generating ssOpenSeg Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:30      (40)  No storage service segments found.

01/28/03   11:26:30      (40) Generating BF Copy Control Context Report:

01/28/03   11:26:30      (40)  No global copy control blocks.

01/28/03   11:26:30

01/28/03   11:26:30      (40) End Context report




-----Original Message-----
From: Cook, Dwight E [mailto:DWIGHT.E.COOK AT SAIC DOT COM]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:34 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: At what level does the 4.2.x server have the session count
fix?


what platform ?
when did it break ?
I'm at 4.2.2.0 on AIX and I get into the millions on a regular
basis...even
10's of millions as I seem to remember.

   Sess
 Number
-------
1,354,1
     76
1,365,0
     47
1,369,9
     14

Dwight


-----Original Message-----
From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:xjolliff AT TI DOT COM]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:30 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: At what level does the 4.2.x server have the session count fix?


In 4.2.3.0, after the session count gets to 65K, the session number can no
longer be stored in the summary table resulting in an ANR9999D message.
(Can anyone say maxint?)

I'm pretty sure a fix is out... I hope.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>