Re: 3494 libray lifespan??
2002-12-16 15:07:54
The biggest complaint I have with the 3584 is the interface via the LCD
panel/web interface.
It is too dumb.
No autoloading of tapes from the I/O station.
1. load 10 tapes in library, then run over to TSM console.
2. TSM commands:
checkin libv 3584lib search=bulk checkl=barcode status=scratch
(or label libv)
q request
reply 1
3. repeat
Ejecting them is also a pain as you have to do them 10 or 30 at a time
depending on the size of your I/O station.
Life is easier with the 3494 and the OS/2's library/tape managment program.
Maybe I am missing somthing with TSM and 3584's
does anyone else have a better way?
Matthew Glanville
matthew.glanville AT kodak DOT com
>Yes, if you had a single Frame of each side by side and took a quick
>look, you'd think they were the same. The "Big Iron" is same design.
>Main difference is the electronics of the library, 3584 is more
>advanced.
>No OS/2 computer for library manager. All now on CPU boards, can
>control from front LCD Panel or Web interface.
>David Longo
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??, (continued)
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??, Cook, Dwight E
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??, Richard Sims
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??, Robert R Price
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??, Pearson, Dave
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??, Seay, Paul
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??, Cook, Dwight E
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??, Pearson, Dave
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??, David Longo
- Re: 3494 libray lifespan??,
Matthew Glanville <=
|
|
|