ADSM-L

Re: TSM SERVER 5.1.5.2

2002-12-10 22:33:46
Subject: Re: TSM SERVER 5.1.5.2
From: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:32:37 -0500
Thay was my original question about 5.1.5.2.  Looks like though I
shouldn't step past 5.1.5.2, that's nice to know.

My question is should I step ON 5.1.5.2 - or wait?  Does it fix
the reclamation problem that has existed for years and not cause
other big problems?

David Longo

>>> Alan.Davenport AT SELECTIVE DOT COM 12/10/02 01:57PM >>>
Does this effect the 5.1.5.2 servers as well?

-----Original Message-----
From: Gretchen L. Thiele [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:17 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: TSM SERVER 5.1.5.2


Be advised that v5.1.5.3 was pulled off the ftp site on Friday
and replaced with 5.1.5.4. There is a problem with the expiration
not actually deleting the files. A new cleanup utility will be
introduced in v5.1.6.x (per support contact yesterday).

I was advised to upgrade our v5.1.5.3 servers *immediately*...

Gretchen Thiele
Princeton University


"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 12/10/2002 10:34:25 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, 
proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or 
privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this 
message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your 
system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender.  You must not, 
directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of 
this message if you are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves the 
right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views or 
opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, 
except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a 
particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such 
views or opinions.

==============================================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>