Yes, 124 is valid address in FC-AL. To explain why will take much more
time than to post an answer to this list.

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Markus Veit <markus.veit AT BAYERBBS DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
28.11.2002 20:00
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc:
        Subject:        device name mt124.1.2.8


Hello,
I have a point to point FC connection with a SAN GW (LTO) and a Modular
Data
Router (3570) using 2 different Emulex HBA's.
All devices show up as mt124.x.x.x and lb124.x.x.x, my question, is that
normal?
W2k SP2, TSM Server 5.1.5.2

Best Regards

Markus Veit