I would think the real issue is the Restore.  Who can get the data back the
fastest, most complete, and has no trouble with old or new data.  I would
like to see Veritas on the backup/restore end and TSM on the ADMIN end.

Thank You,
Bill Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD


|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           "Mr. Lindsay     |
|         |           Morris"          |
|         |           <lmorris@SERVERGR|
|         |           APH.COM>         |
|         |           Sent by: "ADSM:  |
|         |           Dist Stor        |
|         |           Manager"         |
|         |           <[email protected]|
|         |           .EDU>            |
|         |                            |
|         |                            |
|         |           10/18/2002 08:18 |
|         |           AM               |
|         |           Please respond to|
|         |           lmorris          |
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                             
                                                 |
  |       To:       ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU                                 
                                                        |
  |       cc:                                                                   
                                                 |
  |       Subject:  Re: Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5                        
                                                 |
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




1.  Not 100% sure, but Veritas "dominates the market" because they give it
away, right?
I mean, don't they bundle it with Solaris or some other OS, so when they
count their installed base, they count all the Sun boxes whether people are
using it on those boxes or not?

Hope I'm not just disseminating rumor...

2. No other backup product is as robust and well-designed as TSM.  But the
features and efficient use of resources make it complex, so some people may
prefer simplicity and the fun point-and-click interface that come with
Veritas.

3. On a day-one comparison, Veritas does perform better than TSM, because
they BOTH have to do a full backup on day one.  But after a week or a month
has passed, TSM's efficiencies come to light.

TSM resellers have access to a lot of competitive whitepapers - ask your
TSM
reseller to dig into the Tivoli site for you.

---------------------------------
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Lead Architect, Servergraph
www.servergraph.com <http://www.servergraph.com>
859-253-8000 ofc
425-988-8478 fax


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
> Kelvin Tan
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:29 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5
>
>
> Hi Gurus
>
> At the moment we are using TSM 4.2 but the management is looking
> at Veritas Enterprise Netbackup and I have to convince them about
> staying put with TSM.  Has anybody move from TSM to Veritas
> Enterprise Netbackup 4.5 running on Unix??   Any advantages
> Veritas has over TSM?  If TSM is that good how come it does not
> dominate the backup market?  I have read the report of Veritas vs
> TSM but that is on Intel and related to version 3.
>
> Hope somebody can enlightened me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kelvin Tan
>
>
> "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of
> the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first
> sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or
> privileged.
>
> If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please
> delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or
> telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly
> authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying,
> distributing or using the information contained in this message
> and any attachment.
>
> Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any
> changes made to this message or any attachment other than those
> made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others
> on the meaning of this message and any attachment.
>
> Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from
> computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all
> responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting
> directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment."
>