ADSM-L

Re: resourceutilization questions

2002-10-17 07:14:10
Subject: Re: resourceutilization questions
From: John Naylor <john.naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:13:35 +0100
Set your timeout longer, say 120 minutes and see if that solves the problem, and
anyway even
if your non active session times out it should reconnect, if within the backup
window.
This should not prevent the active session from carrying on and completing the
backup normally.
You just do not get the backup statistics sent back to the server.






"Frost, Dave" <dave.frost AT sungard DOT com> on 10/17/2002 10:02:52 AM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <adsm-l AT vm.marist DOT edu>

To:   adsm-l AT vm.marist DOT edu
cc:    (bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject:  resourceutilization questions



Hi,

Does anybody else have problems with backups which have the
resourceutilization option set to greater than one ?

When the option first became available, we experimented with different
values. However, we found that the controlling thread would frequently go
into IDLEWAIT for long periods of time. If the IDLEWAIT state exceeds the
server IDLEWAIT timeout, then the session is terminated. We have seen this
result in a backup showing as 'completed' with all associated stats, but not
actually completing. If the filespaces are viewed, the backup shows as not
completed.

We circumvented this problem by always setting the resourceutilization to
one.

Now, with the release of the version 5 server & client, there is the
functionality for a multi-threaded restore. This requires MAXNUMMP and
RESOURCEUTILIZATION to be set to greater than one, to allow a restore to use
more than one tape and thus reap the performance benefits.

However, even with a version 5.1.1.4 server and version 5.1.1 client, we
still see the controlling thread timeout of a multi-thread backup. Our
IDLEWAIT parameter is set to 45 mins.

The resourceutlization parameter is now of some considerable use when doing
restores, but does not seem to function correctly when backing up.

Has anybody else seen this and if so, have you found a fix.

Thanks


  regards,

-=Dave=-
--
+44 (0)20 7608 7140

Accountants' minds are always in NumLock!


________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________








**********************************************************************
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy plc.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission.

Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S+S
are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group.
**********************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>