FYI

IBM is partners with OTG Diskextender (HSM for windows) now Legato
Diskxtender.

Justin




Mark Stapleton <stapleto AT BERBEE DOT COM>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 10/10/2002 
11:30:34
PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

Sent by:    "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


To:    ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:

Subject:    Re: Optimizing Restores


From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Brown, Bud
> HSM products - Makes sense to have 40-60% of data already on tape
> and not have to restore in a disaster.  Currently we are trying
> to implement DX2000(I know Legato owns it, politics have pushed
> this solution), but backup and overall performance of the box has
> crawled while drivers and services are enabled.

I'll address this last item:

HSM works well in the following environment: 1) the client is a large file
server with a high percentage of static, unaccessed files; 2) the tape
library has a fast mount and seek time (the IBM 3575 comes to mind); and 3)
the client has a large *fast* processor.

Disk Xtender 2000 is pretty hard on the processor during the windows you
set
for its activity. I would *never* run it during the production day, and I
would not run it during backup times. I wish that OTG had developed a
TSM-compliant HSM client for Windows, instead of an HSM server.

I wish wish wish that Tivoli would create an HSM client for Windows. I know
it will never happen, because of the robust server functionalities that
Microsoft's server OSs have never had. But one can hope...

--
Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
Certified TSM consultant
Certified AIX system engineer
 MCSE