ADSM-L

Re: Help for 2108 failure

2002-09-18 10:54:11
Subject: Re: Help for 2108 failure
From: Jason Liang <tsmlist AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 10:50:08 -0400
Thanks for all you prompt responses.

I figured out the problem was the /dev/rmtX and element mapping has been
changed since the 2108 right after I sent out my help message.

I re-defined the drives in TSM, then the problem has been solved.

Thanks you gurus, Dan, David, Suad and Mark. You guys are so helpful!


Jason Liang
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Foster" <dsf AT GBLX DOT NET>
To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: Help for 2108 failure


> The other possibility is that since the 2108 was replaced, there may
> be a small chance the /dev/rmtX mapping no longer matches what the
> previously assigned rmtX-to-element ID mapping was.
>
> Which conceivably could produce this sort of error, if TSM and
> the library disagreed about what logical/physical drive matched up?
>
> What I'd suggest is:
>
> tsm> q drive f=d
>
> Then note each rmtX device name and what element ID it corresponds to.
> (in TSM)
>
> Then do some tracing to figure out which element ID each rmtX device
> actually physically corresponds to.
>
> Then you'll soon see if the TSM setup and the probed devices in AIX
> matches or not.
>
> If they don't match, update the TSM drive entries for rmtX and element ID
> ASAP.
>
> Should normally take only about 5-10 minutes of work to figure out the
> mapping from scratch. Keep good notes and issue a whole bunch of commands
> to assist in the logical-to-physical tracing.
>
> I just finished fixing all this after no end of fun with the 3584 setup
> and mismatched rmtX/element IDs.
>
> -Dan
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>