Re: multiple reclaim processes
2002-09-06 00:25:13
Not sure what Wayne was saying but this is from TSM 4.2.1 and maybe lower,
just do not remember when reconstruct was introduced.
>>-MOVe Data--volume_name--+-----------------------+------------>
'-STGpool--=--pool_name-'
.-RECONStruct--=--No------. .-Wait--=--No------.
>--+-------------------------+--+------------------+-----------><
'-RECONStruct--=--+-No--+-' '-Wait--=--+-No--+-'
'-Yes-' '-Yes-'
MOVE DATA supports reconstructing aggregates, but not a MAXPR parameter.
However, you can run as many simultaneous MOVE DATA commands as your system
can stand.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne T. Smith [mailto:ADSM AT MAINE DOT EDU]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:34 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: multiple reclaim processes
Two quick (and probably obvious) points:
- You can do multiple simultaneous reclamations if you have multiple storage
pools. Long on tape drives? Create another domain (& storage
pool(s)) and split your nodes between them.
- MOVE DATA (tape to tape, or tape back to disk) allows multiple
simultaneous processes on one storage pool and each is often faster than
the corresponding reclamation. The down-side to MOVE DATA is that
aggregates are not reconstructed, so your newly filled tape will immediately
have reclaimable space. Perhaps a statistician could tell us the expected
wasted space remaining after a MOVE DATA. Maybe with too many caveats to be
useful, ... but when I switched from exclusively performing MOVE DATAs to
exclusively performing reclamation, I "gained" almost 20% empty volumes.
cheers, wayne
Wayne T. Smith, ADSM AT Maine DOT edu, University of Maine System
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- multiple reclaim processes, Levinson, Donald A.
- Re: multiple reclaim processes, Malbrough, Demetrius
- Re: multiple reclaim processes, bbullock
- Re: multiple reclaim processes, Wayne T. Smith
- Re: multiple reclaim processes, Seay, Paul
- FW: multiple reclaim processes, Prather, Wanda
- Re: multiple reclaim processes,
Seay, Paul <=
|
|
|