ADSM-L

Requirement for licence data collection

2002-08-29 20:13:28
Subject: Requirement for licence data collection
From: Steve Harris <Steve_Harris AT HEALTH.QLD.GOV DOT AU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:50:46 +1000
Hi All,

I'm just going through a painful licence data collection exercise.  I have some 
80 nodes registered, but not all these need to be paid for as we set up one 
node per application on our clusters.

Up till now I was managing this adequately with an excel spreadsheet because I 
just needed to keep track of separate machines:tier1 for Wintel and Tier 2 for 
everything else. Now, with new new licencing model I need to know how many CPUs 
as well and this information is not easy to get.

I've "outsourced"  the setting up of new nodes on non-AIX platforms to the 
platform support guys, and even if I manually intervened when I created new 
nodes, it is really easy for someone to move a node from one machine to 
another, or install a new CPU board and I don't get to know about it.  I've 
looked into pushing scripts down to all my nodes and trying to run some sort of 
command to get the number of cpus, but this is very difficult to do.  On Wintel 
there is a command, but only if you have the reskit installed and you can run 
the cscript command etc etc. There are even some boxes that I back up that I 
have no rights to and have never even had this sort of information.

I therefore suggest that there is a requirement for 

1. a data collection mechanism to return to the TSM server the number of CPUs 
and other relevent licencing information on a regular basis.  This information 
should include the system serial number where this is available, or some sort 
of checksum based on installed equipment a-la Windows XP's anti-piracy feature 
where it is not.
2. This data to be stored appropriately in the database.
3. Audit lic to be updated to report licence compliance in the same terms as 
are required by Passport Advantage licencing. ie by number of CPUs on distinct 
machines.

This requirement could be satisfied by simple extensions to the TSM database 
NODES table to hold the appropriate information.  The information could be 
passsed at dsmc startup in the same way that the IP address is.  The only 
difficult issue is that Intel architecture machines don't have serial numbers.  
THe windows XP checksum approach will work here even if it doesn't all that 
well on XP because we are only trying to make a unique checksum for comparison 
purposes. We don't care if it changes provided that it changes in the same way 
for all nodes that run on the machine.  The checksum mechanism should also be 
the same for all OSes running on intel architecture so that correct licencing 
is available for machines logically partioned using VMware or equivalent 
products.

I was recently involved in a backup product selection exercise and ease or 
difficulty of licence mangement was a huge issue amongst the admins at various 
levels in the organization, for several different products.  At that time TSM 
had a big plus because managment was easy.  It is no longer.


Discussion?

Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Brisbane Australia    







**********************************************************************
This e-mail, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential 
and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality 
is not waived or lost if you receive it and you are not the intended 
recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/ received in error.  

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review 
of this e-mail is prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of 
confidentiality if it relates to health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this 
e-mail in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by 
telephone or by return e-mail.  You should also delete this e-mail 
message and destroy any hard copies produced.
**********************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Requirement for licence data collection, Steve Harris <=