ADSM-L

Re: More on mount points

2002-08-15 14:48:39
Subject: Re: More on mount points
From: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:30:46 -0400
For each device class there is a "Mount limit", generally this
is set to DRIVES, which allows that devclass to use as many drives
as you have.  Maybe yours is set to a specific number.  Each tape
pool you have, then uses a devclass and therefore is limited to
using no more than that many drives.

David Longo

>>> David.E.McMullen AT IRS DOT GOV 08/15/02 09:05AM >>>
Can anyone give me any help on the mountpoint problem I posted earlier?

>>I turned on collocation last week and now I am getting this message:
>>
>>ANR1082W Space reclamation terminated for volume 4A0023 - insufficient
number of mount points >>available for removable media.
>>
>>I looked up the error message and it tells me:User Response: If necessary,
make more mount points available
>>
>>Is this the same as mount limit for the server?  I see that you can
specify number of mount points for a
>>node.  But how can you specify this for a tape?

David Mac



"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 08/15/2002 09:32:02 AM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, 
proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or 
privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this 
message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your 
system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender.  You must not, 
directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of 
this message if you are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves the 
right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views or 
opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, 
except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a 
particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such 
views or opinions.

==============================================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>