Re: Occupancy comparison script
2002-07-23 09:16:16
Subject: |
Re: Occupancy comparison script |
From: |
Henk ten Have <hthta AT SARA DOT NL> |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:14:34 +0200 |
On 23-Jul-02 Prather, Wanda wrote:
> This goes top down instead of side by side ...
> but it's quick and easy!
>
> select stgpool_name, sum(physical_mb)/1024 as physical_GB
> from occupancy -
> group by stgpool_name order by stgpool_name
Hmm....I think it's "not quick and dirty"...;-) :
ANR2963W This SQL query may produce a very large result table, or may
require a significant amount of time to compute.
And yes, it take some time, but the result is ok.
Cheers,
Henk ten Have.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Occupancy comparison script, Jolliff, Dale
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Seay, Paul
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Jolliff, Dale
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Jolliff, Dale
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Jolliff, Dale
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Occupancy comparison script,
Henk ten Have <=
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Jolliff, Dale
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Seay, Paul
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Seay, Paul
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Ilja G. Coolen
- Re: Occupancy comparison script, Jolliff, Dale
|
|
|