I have not seen this, but I would assume TSM process  in the order which
the command was received.



Sung Y. Lee
E-mail sunglee AT us.ibm DOT com



                      "Gill, Geoffrey
                      L."                      To:       ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST 
DOT EDU
                      <GEOFFREY.L.GILL@        cc:
                      SAIC.COM>                Subject:  Checkin libvol V5.1.1 
server
                      Sent by: "ADSM:
                      Dist Stor
                      Manager"
                      <[email protected]
                      .EDU>


                      07/16/2002 01:07
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      "ADSM: Dist Stor
                      Manager"





I just upgraded my test server to TSM 5.1.1. I can't say I ever noticed
this
on the V4 server so I don't know if this is the same or different. I
checked
in 9 scratch volumes separately so I could watch all 9 processes finish.
The
first 6 I purposefully use checkl=yes to force mounts on drives to see if
they were ok. The last 3 with checkl=no. The last 3 process with checkl=no
sat there till the last process of checkl=yes finished before they ran. Not
sure why a process not checking a label couldn't finish sooner than one
that
is. Anyone else seen this?

Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail:    <mailto:gillg AT saic DOT com> gillg AT saic DOT com
Phone:  (858) 826-4062
Pager:   (877) 905-7154