|
Include/Exclude: UNCs vs. drive letters
2002-06-14 17:58:36
|
Subject: |
Include/Exclude: UNCs vs. drive letters |
|
From: |
Ken Long <ken.long AT WHEDA DOT COM> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:56:52 -0500 |
Our TSM server is absorbing the backups of many W2K servers, raising some
issues I haven't had to deal with.
How well does TSM handle UNC's in include/excludes? Which are preferred or
easier to work with, UNC's or drive letter and wild cards? Are there any
pitfalls I should avoid?
Also, what do I need to do differently when W2K servers use DFS in concert
with replication to "share" files/directories between servers?
Your advice is appreciated... Ken
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Include/Exclude: UNCs vs. drive letters,
Ken Long <=
|
|
|
