Thanks,

an additional question before setting up the configuration :
second copy-pool with same device-class means that the data physically go to
the same tape-pool on the other server, because it works with the default
management-class for that server ( where the pool name is defined). Is this
correct ? 
So the only additional config to make (beneath defining the second
copy-pool) is increasing the 'mount limit' in device-class 'server' on the
one side where copy-pool is defined to the number of copy-pools I define ?

Thanks
Christoph



> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:  Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [SMTP:acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET]
> Gesendet am:  Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 07:47
> An:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Betreff:      Re: server-to-server copy-pools
> 
> Other server is related not to copy pool but to the device class. You have
> only to define second pool over same devclass.
> 
> Zlatko Krastev
> IT Consultant
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> Sent by:        "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> cc:
> 
> Subject:        server-to-server copy-pools
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> today we have two servers connected via server-to-server. Both server have
> defined their copy-pool on the other server.
> I would like to split the copy-pool into two different ones. Reason is to
> run stg-pool-backups in more than one session parallel..
> Does anybody know, if this is possible and how I can set up two different
> copypools on a server, that are accessed via server-to-server connection
> from one other server.
> 
> Thanks for any help
> 
> Christoph