|
Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape
2002-02-21 11:34:37
|
Subject: |
Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape |
|
From: |
"Wu, Jie" <JWu AT NCTR.FDA DOT GOV> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:31:24 -0600 |
From the info you provided, your primary stgpool, the diskpool on Compaq
disk cabinet, and the migrationpool defined on the 3584-L32 are sharing the
same FC card. If thishis is the case, it is a bad design. You may use two FC
card on the P610. One for the Compaq FC disk cabinet and the other for the
3584-L32. I believe this way you will get better performance.
Jie
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape,
Wu, Jie <=
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Allen Barth
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Seay, Paul
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Bill Mansfield
- Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Daniel Sparrman [mailto:daniel.sparrman
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Allen Barth [mailto:allen_barth
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|
