ADSM-L

Re: defining lto drive not looking correct

2002-02-07 00:53:28
Subject: Re: defining lto drive not looking correct
From: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:44:29 -0500
Is the server on AIX system or something else?  Makes a difference.  Did you 
you look at actlog when you defined and see if any errors or other messages.  
Do these devices exist at the OS level?

David Longo

>>> Becky.Davidson AT SLBG DOT COM 02/06/02 03:14PM >>>
Due to other issues I deleted all of my lto drives and library and am
redefining them.  I am following through multiple redbooks and manuals that
say
def library ltolib libt=scsi device=/dev/smc1
and then for the drive
def drive ltolib ltormt17 device=/dev/rmt17 element=257
but when I do a q dr ltolib all of the drives show up as generic?!?!

I am sure I have missed something simple but what am I missing...I know they
showed up as lto before what am I doing wrong or am I simply losing my mind?

Becky Davidson
Data Manager/AIX Administrator
EDS/Sara Lee Bakery Group
voice: 314-259-7589
fax: 314-877-8589
email: becky.davidson AT slbg DOT com 



"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 02/06/02 15:57:16
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain This message 
is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary, 
or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived 
or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please 
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard 
copies of it, and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, 
use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are 
not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all 
e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in 
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the 
message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;  
and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions.

==============================================================================