Re: exclude syntax frustration
2002-01-05 05:31:22
Also, if you really want to prune the tree, you should use exclude.fs or
exclude.dir directives, otherwise TSM will back up directories.
_____________________________
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
"Glass, Peter"
<Peter.K.Glass@WELLS To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT
EDU
FARGO.COM> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: exclude syntax
frustration
Stor Manager"
<ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT ED
U>
01/04/2002 05:45 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
TSM seems to ignore our exclude statements, no matter which wildcard syntax
we use. For example, we have filesystems called /db1/oracle, /db2/oracle,
etc. through /db30/oracle that we want to exclude. We've tried:
exclude /db[1-30]/oracle/.../*
and
exclude /db*/oracle/.../*
and
exclude /.../oracle/.../*
without success: in each case, the backups still try to backup the files
under these directories. The backups usually fail to pick up the files,
because the files change during the backup, which is why we want to exclude
them.
Are we misunderstanding how wildcards are supposed to work with exclude
statements? Or is this a product bug?
Peter Glass
Distributed Storage Management (DSM)
Wells Fargo Services Company
> * 612-667-0086 * 866-407-5362
> * peter.k.glass AT wellsfargo DOT com
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- exclude syntax frustration, Glass, Peter
- Re: exclude syntax frustration, Seay, Paul
- Re: exclude syntax frustration, David Longo
- Re: exclude syntax frustration,
Bill Mansfield <=
- Re: exclude syntax frustration, Orville L. Lantto
- exclude syntax frustration, Glass , Peter [mailto:Peter.K.Glass
- exclude syntax frustration, Unknown
- exclude syntax frustration, Glass, Peter
|
|
|