Re: Please Explain

I don't think it is a bug. I think is because my network (SP Switch) capacity 
greatly exceeds the clients ability to send data (even though is an S80). If in 
effect I'm running 2,3,4,5 backups concurrently.
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4952I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of 
                      objects inspected:  135 487                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4954I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of 
                         objects backed up:    2 309                            
  
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4958I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of 
                       objects updated:          0                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4960I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of 
                         objects rebound:          0                            
  
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4957I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of 
                         objects deleted:          0                            
  
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4970I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of 
                         objects expired:     13 138                            
  
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4959I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of 
                         objects failed:           0                            
  
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4961I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of 
                          bytes transferred:    60.53 GB                        
   
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4963I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Data transfer 
time:                                    8 261.61 sec                           
   
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4966I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Network data    
                        transfer rate:        7 682.73 KB/sec                   
 
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4967I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Aggregate data  
                       transfer rate:      12 445.33 KB/sec                     
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4968I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Objects 
compressed                      by:                    0%                       
         
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4964I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Elapsed 
processing                    time:            01:25:00                         
       

Miles


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
Miles Purdy 
Miles Purdy 
System Manager
Farm Income Programs Directorate
Winnipeg, MB, CA
purdym AT fipd.gc DOT ca
ph: (204) 984-1602 fax: (204) 983-7557

"If you hold a UNIX shell up to your ear, can you hear the C?"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
>>> Robin_Sharpe AT BERLEX DOT COM 20-Dec-01 8:20:26 AM >>>
>>> Robin_Sharpe AT BERLEX DOT COM 20-Dec-01 8:20:26 AM >>>
I don't see how aggregate  rate could exceed network rate.   Aggregate is
Bytes Transferred divided by Elapsed Time, and Network is Bytes Transferred
divided by Data Transfer Time....  what were those values in the session
where Aggregate was greater than Network?  How could Data Transfer Time be
greater than Elapsed Time?  Must be a bug!

Robin Sharpe
Berlex Labs



                    Miles Purdy
                    <PURDYM@FIPD.
                    GC.CA>        To:    ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 
                                  cc:    (bcc: Robin Sharpe/WA/USR/SHG)
                    12/20/01      Subject:
                    08:44 AM             Re: Please Explain
                    Please
                    respond to
                    "ADSM: Dist
                    Stor Manager"







The network transfer rate is the time is takes to send the file to be
backed up to the TSM server.

The aggregate is the total KB backed up / the total time.

The difference is the processing time. The time to contact the TSM server
and check if the file needs to be backed up.

Interestingly enough, my aggregate usually exceeds the network, I was
asking yesterday if any one else sees this.
Miles


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
Miles Purdy
Miles Purdy
System Manager
Farm Income Programs Directorate
Winnipeg, MB, CA
purdym AT fipd.gc DOT ca 
ph: (204) 984-1602 fax: (204) 983-7557

"If you hold a UNIX shell up to your ear, can you hear the C?"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
>>> rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL 20-Dec-01 4:45:16 AM >>>
>>> rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL 20-Dec-01 4:45:16 AM >>>
Hi

I run  a full backup of a Netware 5 with Tivoli client 4.2.0 here the
statistics:

 12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects inspected:   33,310
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects backed up:   33,104
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects updated:          0
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects rebound:          0
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects deleted:          0
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects expired:          0
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects failed:           3
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of bytes transferred:     1.33 GB
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Data transfer time:                  138.38 sec
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Network data transfer rate:        10,099.94 KB/sec
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Aggregate data transfer rate:        802.25 KB/sec
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Objects compressed by:                    0%
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Elapsed processing time:           00:29:02

Can anybody explain why my Network data transfer rate is so high but my
Aggregate data transfer rate is low !!!!!!!!!!!!

T.I.A Regards

Robert Ouzen
E-mail: rouzen AT univ.haifa.ac DOT il