Re: New Server and Disk Pools
2001-09-10 06:49:55
--- Mark Stapleton wrote:
I wouldn't bother with *any* kind of array. Save yourself the expense
I wouldn't bother with *any* kind of array. Save yourself the expense
and administrative overhead of an array. Just cache the disk pool and
spill it over into tape daily. Easy-peezy.
--- end of quote ---
But then you loose the quick restore from disk, and the client has to wait for a
But then you loose the quick restore from disk, and the client has to wait for a
tape mount if you flush the entire disk cache to tape. Or am I missing
something?
Steve Cochran
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, (continued)
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, Jeff Bach
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, Jeff Bach
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, Jeff Bach
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, Boireau, Eric (MED)
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools,
Stephen A. Cochran <=
- Re: New Server and Disk Pools, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
|
|
|