ADSM-L

Re: how to tell 3.1 server to not allow migration/reclaim

2001-08-27 20:13:44
Subject: Re: how to tell 3.1 server to not allow migration/reclaim
From: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:14:37 -0400
Dont't have a 3494 but one thing I do when my library is down is use
command UPDATE DRIVE to set online to NO, for each of the drives in 
library.  This won't stop processes from starting but they will not "lock 
up" trying to get a drive.  You can easily cancel them when they start.

(I have TSM 3.7,  the option I mentioned may not be available on 3.1, 
don't remember).



David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH      321.434.5536
Pager  321.634.8230
Fax:    321.434.5525
david.longo AT health-first DOT org


>>> jacksonj AT MICHAELS DOT COM 08/27/01 07:37PM >>>
I need to keep a 3.1 server from allowing processes to run until my 3494
is operational again.  Is there an option to set in dsm.opt or dsm.sys
in 3.1 like the
nomigrrecl in 3.7???

I tried this in the dsm.opt but cant start the server with the entry
there.



"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 08/27/01 20:20:53
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain This message 
is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary, 
or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived 
or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please 
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard 
copies of it, and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, 
use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are 
not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all 
e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in 
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the 
message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;  
and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions.

==============================================================================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>