Oops.. I went to 4.2.0.1, and that's where I have the problem.

Thanks, guess I will call support tomorrow, then..

On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, David McClelland wrote:

> Tom,
>
> Yes, apparently this is a known bug - you should have a look at the latest
> patch (4.2.0.1) , rather than the flat 4.2 version, although I'm of the
> understanding that the licensing problem is still an issue here too...
>
> There'll be a fix for this along soon - can anyone add any more to this?
>
> Rgds,
>
> David McClelland
> ---------------------------
> Tivoli Storage Management Team
> IBM EMEA Technical Centre,
> Mail Point SGJ3, IBM, North Harbour, Portsmouth PO6 3AU, England
> Internet: davidmcclelland AT uk.ibm DOT com
>
>
>
> Tom Tann{s <tom.tannas AT USIT.UIO DOT NO>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 15-08-2001 
> 14:46:22
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
> Sent by:  "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
>
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> cc:
> Subject:  TSM 4.2 (AIX), licensing..
>
>
>
> Hello!
>
> I upgraded a server from 4.1 to 4.2 today.
>
> I've only managed to register one 50mgsyslan.lic whith the command
> register lic file=50mgsyslan.lic number=12
>
> additional attempts toregister more result in the same..
>
> tsm: SUMO>register license file=50mgsyslan.lic
> ANR2852I Current license information:
> ANR2827I Server is licensed to support Managed System for LAN for a
> quantity of 60.
> ANR2853I New license information:
> ANR2827I Server is licensed to support Managed System for LAN for a
> quantity of 60.
>
> tsm: SUMO>
>
> (Its 60 now because I successfully registered one 10mgsyslan.lic)
>
>
> After several attempts I took a look at the nodelock-file, and this file
> seems to be updated correctly, with one entry for each of my attempts..
>
> .
> .
> .
> .
> # Managed System for LAN 50 Licen
> 6fb1ea8d2ebc.a3.89.a3.25.04.00.00.00 8umtikm47qkykpffafnaa "" "4.2"
> #[admin_comment] "" "" "0" "0" "0"
> # Managed System for LAN 50 Licen
> 6fb1ea8d2ebc.a3.89.a3.25.04.00.00.00 8umtikm47qkykpffafnaa "" "4.2"
> #[admin_comment] "" "" "0" "0" "0"
>
>
>
>
> So... Could this be a bug, or am I missing something here?
>