ADSM-L

DOMAIN vs INCLUDE/EXCLUDE

2001-06-20 13:24:13
Subject: DOMAIN vs INCLUDE/EXCLUDE
From: "Mills, John" <John_Mills AT PURINAMILLS DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:25:11 -0500
*SMers,
   I have heard that DOMAINs are much cheaper to process
than INCLUDE/EXCLUDE lists, but my experience has been
limited to the later since 2.1.  We are now at 4.1 and
I'd like to take advantage of the DOMAIN tag on an NT
client w/ 200GB of data.
   Does anyone have any advice or experience with this
type of optimization?  I have found that the box has many
small files, and it is not fully utilizing a 100Mbit NIC
w/ the TSM server on a Gigabit.  It seems that file IO or
overhead is slowing the backup.

  Here's the current config.

LANG AMENG
tcpport          1500
TCPServeraddress curly.purina-mills.com
passwordaccess generate
Largecommbuffers yes
tcpbuffsize     512
tcpnodelay      yes
tcpwindowsize   63
txnbytelimit    25600
SCHEDLOGRETENTION       2
errorlogretention       3
schedmode prompted

*** EXCLUSIONS ***
Exclude *:\...\recycler\...\*.*

Exclude *:\...\pagefile.sys
Exclude *:\IBMBIO.COM
Exclude *:\IBMDOS.COM
Exclude *:\MSDOS.SYS
Exclude *:\IO.SYS
Exclude *:\...\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\*.*
Exclude *:\...\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\...\*
*CUSTOM
Exclude *:\...\*.TMP
Exclude *:\...\NTUSER.DAT*
Exclude *:\...\USRCLASS.DAT*
Exclude *:\...\PERFLIB_PERFDATA*
Exclude *:\...\NTFRS.JDB
Exclude *:\...\EDB.LOG
Exclude *:\...\TMP.EDB
Exclude *:\...\TEMP.EDB
Exclude *:\...\NTDS.DIT

        John T. Mills
        AIX System Administrator
        Purina Mills
        john_mills AT purina-mills DOT com
        (314) 768-4719
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>