ADSM-L

Re: tsm mirroring vs pprc

2001-06-12 22:28:56
Subject: Re: tsm mirroring vs pprc
From: Joel Fuhrman <joelf AT CAC.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:27:51 -0700
Dave, what the level of the TSM server that caused this problem?

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Frost, Dave wrote:

> Richard,
>
> "BTDTGTTS"
>
> We are running tsm using san attached emc for all disk storage.  On initial
> setup of the emc, we decided to stop using log/db mirroring, and use the emc
> mirroring instead.
>
> Soon afterwards, we had 2 instances where we could not restart the server.
> Both times the server failed to restart because of an inconsistency in the
> db log file.  The emc mirroring had faithfully replicated the inconsistency,
> of course.  In each case, the database had to be restored.  Given a 35 GB
> database, a restore can take about 2.5 hours.
>
> IBM said that they "strongly recommend tsm mirroring", preferably with
> verification.
>
> So do we, now.
>
> regards
>
> -=Dave=-
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Bates [mailto:Richard_Bates AT UK.IBM DOT COM]
> Sent: 08 June 2001 12:25
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: tsm mirroring vs pprc
>
>
> Folks,
>
> Customer site: TSM running on AIX.  2 x IBM Enterprise Storage Server, one
> per data centre. SAN connecting it all together.
>
> Problem: I've seen and read all the posts about TSM mirroring vs AIX
> mirroring vs RAID mirroring.  I understand the probem with partial page
> writes and prefer TSM mirroring.  We had planned to implement TSM mirroring
> with a copy of the database and recovery log on IBM ESS in both of the data
> centres.
>
> However company strategy says that *all* mirroring must be done via PPRC.
> Does anyone have any experience with PPRC?  Can it cope with partial page
> writes?  Am I safer to use TSM mirroring?
>
> Regards
> Richard.
>
> Richard Bates
> Storage Specialist
> ITS - SB - Enterprise Consultancy Services
> ==========================================
> Voice :  00 44  (0) 1926 462298  (HICOM : 662298)  (MOBEX : 270798)
> richard_bates AT uk.ibm DOT com
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus
> Control Centre.
>
> www.guardianit.com
>
> The information contained in this email is confidential and intended
> only for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication
> is strictly prohibited.  Guardian iT Group will accept no responsibility
> or liability in respect to this email other than to the addressee.  If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us
> immediately via email: postmaster AT guardianit DOT com
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus 
> Control Centre.
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>