Re: HTTP sessions in TSM 4.1.3.0 (also, memory leak...)
2001-05-29 15:52:42
Subject: |
Re: HTTP sessions in TSM 4.1.3.0 (also, memory leak...) |
From: |
Allen Barth <allen_barth AT SCUDDER DOT COM> |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2001 14:52:26 -0500 |
Hmmm, a wide spread problem. I have these sessions from time to time with
a TSM 4.1.1 server running in AIX 4.3.3 ml 6. I've found that when these
sessions are present, the CPU is maxed out. Killing these sessions
restores the CPU to normal usage. I've played with several versions/makes
of browsers and have not been able to 'create' these types of rouge
sessions. I suspect they'll go away when the IDLETIMEOUT is reached, but
that's just a guess.
Al Barth
Zurich Scudder Investments
Steve Schaub
<Steve.Schaub@HA To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
WORTH.COM> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: HTTP sessions in
TSM 4.1.3.0 (also, memory
Dist Stor leak...)
Manager"
<[email protected]
T.EDU>
05/25/01 04:41
AM
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
We had the same problem here with 3.7.3.8 on AIX 4.3.3 - getting our
w/95/nt admin machines up to IE5.5 solved the problem for us.
Steve Schaub
Haworth, Inc
email: Steve.Schaub AT Haworth DOT com
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
>>> stvernaillen AT GE.COKECCE DOT COM 05/25 3:28 AM >>>
Michael Oski <moski AT APPLE DOT COM> on 24/05/2001 19:31:11
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc: (bcc: Stan Vernaillen/BE/CCE)
Subject: Re: HTTP sessions in TSM 4.1.3.0 (also, memory leak...)
>Hello, I did quite a bit of testing of different browsers against
>different patch levels of TSM 3.7 regarding this problem. The key point
>to remember - DON'T try to cancel the sessions! It will skyrocket your
>CPU utilization and remain that way until dsmserv is restarted.
I have the same problem server is AIX 3.7.4 client Win 95 with IE5
The ghost sessions eat away resources, I always cancel them an dCPU
immediatly
goes down to normal again....!
My colleague with exactly the smae setup does not have the problem !
Just glad I'm not alone ;)
>My testing was performed only on MacOS 9.1/X and Solaris Sparc. I have
>no way to test Windows since I don't have any PC's (I work at Apple).
>The only two browsers that handled the webadmin interface correctly were
>Netscape/Mozilla and iCab for MacOS. Internet Explorer for MacOS X
>native or Classic mode, OmniWeb for MacOS, and Internet Explorer via
>Windows it MacOS's VirtualPC emulator.
>Hope this helps,
>MO
|
|
|