ADSM-L

Re: AW: DSM.OPT override question.

2001-04-27 10:33:58
Subject: Re: AW: DSM.OPT override question.
From: Andy Raibeck <Andrew_Raibeck AT TIVOLI DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 07:33:48 -0700
If the product's vendor is making a recommendation about how to back up (or
how not to back up) their product, it's probably a good idea to heed that
recommendation. You do not want to be in a position where you need to
restore, and the vendor can not help because you did not follow their
recommended backup procedure.

That said, it would be a good idea to ask the vendor why they make that
recommendation, so that you can evaluate its technical merits. In this
case, the vendor may have a very good reason for recomending against
incremental backups; on the other hand, perhaps they do not understand what
is meant by "incremental" backup, so again, a discussion as to why they
make the recommendation is a good idea, so that all parties understand the
issues.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Tivoli Systems
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
e-mail: araibeck AT tivoli DOT com
"The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked."
"The command line is your friend"


sal Salak Juraj <sal AT KEBA.CO DOT AT>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/26/2001 11:06:16 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

Sent by:  "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:
Subject:  AW: DSM.OPT override question.



not a direct help for your OPT problem
but a general though about misconception
it has been caused by:

Much too often we speak - with our
vendors and bosses and customers as well -
about backup requirements.

NOBODY HAS ANY BACKUP REQUIREMENTS,
WE ALL DO ONLY HAVE RESTORE REQUIREMENTS.

The backup is only a way to accomplish it,
backup is only a tool and maybe a method,
but not our target.

If you happen to make your vendor understand this,
the chances are better he will not matter
what name of backup - incremental or selective - you use.

regards
Juraj Salak


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>