make the management class the data has been archived with not the default
management class, then make a new default management class.
Then change the retention as needed.

Jeff Bach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boireau, Eric (MED) [SMTP:eric.boireau AT MED.GE DOT COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:28 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: Rebinding archive to management class
>
> Try to do an export of the node and those tape you will kept then 730
> days.
> It is not very useful for restore but it will works I think
>
> Regards,
> Salutations / Best Regards
> g            GE Medical Systems
> ___________________________________________
> Eric Boireau                               Global Systems
> Server Architect / Technology & Infrastructure Team
>
> GE Medical Systems S.A
> 283, rue de la Miniere
> 78533 BUC Cedex France
> Tel: (33) 1 30 70 39 32,  DC: 8*644 3932
> Fax: (33) 1 30 70 42 30, DC: 8*644 3930
> mailto:Eric.Boireau AT med.ge DOT com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew A. Bacchi [mailto:mbacchi AT BTV.IBM DOT COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:55 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Rebinding archive to management class
>
>
> Folks,
>         I know its not possible to rebind previously archived files to a
> new
>
> management class, but I want to try it anyway.  My customer has been using
> the
> default management class when archiving in the past, but wants to increase
> the
> retention period from 180 to 730 days.  I can't do this for the default
> management class, so I have decided to create another management class
> with
> a
> 730 day retention period.  So, his newly archived files will be bound to
> this
> second management class, but his old ones will still be bound to the
> default
>
> class.
>         To 'coerce' ADSM into rebinding his previously archived files I
> was
> thinking of creating a new policy domain, and associating the node with
> this
>
> domain.  In this case, all archive files will become rebound to the
> management
> class with the same name as in the old policy domain, or in the case that
> a
> management class of the same name doesn't exist, they will use the grace
> retention period.  Am I on the right track here?  Can anyone recommend a
> better way to do this?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> -Matt
>
> /**
>  **    Matt Bacchi                   mbacchi AT us.ibm DOT com
>  **    IBM Global Services                SDC Northeast
>  **    F6TG; MD Filesystems/Internet     (802) 769-4072
>  **    ADSM & AFS/DFS Backup             (tie) 446-4072
>  **/


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed.  If you have received this email
in error destroy it immediately.
**********************************************************************