Re: finding unused mgmt classes - why didn't this work?
2001-04-17 11:22:26
Subject: |
Re: finding unused mgmt classes - why didn't this work? |
From: |
"Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF." <Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM> |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:23:00 +0200 |
Could be that you wrote the class_name in lower case instead of higher case
?
René Lambelet
Nestec S.A. / Informatique du Centre
55, av. Nestlé CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland)
*+41'21'924'35'43 7+41'21'924'28'88 * K4-117
email rene.lambelet AT nestle DOT com
Visit our site: http://www.nestle.com
This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gina Glenewinkel [SMTP:gglenewi AT CSC DOT COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 5:18 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: finding unused mgmt classes - why didn't this work?
>
> Some time ago I posted to this list a question about how to find out if my
> old management classes are still managing any client data. A couple of
> you
> responded suggesting this select statement: select * from archives where
> class_name='classname' and the same for backups. I ran this on several
> management classes and got "no match found for this query". Thinking that
> meant there was no data found governed by that management class, I deleted
> it and got the expected message about any data will be rebound to the
> default management class. I did not expect any data to be rebound. Turns
> out, I deleted some active management classes by mistake because I thought
> they weren't being used.
>
> Can anyone tell me why my select statement didn't work as expected?
>
> /gina
|
|
|