Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only?
2001-04-11 14:00:10
Back in November you described this implementation, which makes a major
reduction in the time required to do a DIRMC offsite copy reclamation:
> DIRPOOL primary DISK: NEXTPOOL->DIRFILE
> DIRFILE primary SEQUENTIAL on DISK
> DIRCOPYPOOL copypool TAPE
Would you mind posting the output from a:
query stg DIRFILE format=detail
and a:
query devclass <device_class_name_from_query_stg>
I'm assuming "SEQUENTIAL on DISK" means a device class type of FILE. But I
want to be sure, before making the change.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only?,
Joel Fuhrman <=
|
|
|