ADSM-L

Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)

2001-03-19 06:12:55
Subject: Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)
From: Gerrit van Zyl <gvanzyl AT FARITEC.CO DOT ZA>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:13:18 +0200
Steffan,

No, not at all.  It is the standard exclude statements:

Exclude "*:\macintosh volume\*"
Exclude "*:\macintosh volume\*.*"
Exclude "*:\macintosh volume\...\*"
Exclude "*:\macintosh volume\...\*.*"
Exclude "*:\microsoft uam volume\*"
Exclude "*:\microsoft uam volume\*.*"
Exclude "*:\microsoft uam volume\...\*"
Exclude "*:\microsoft uam volume\...\*.*"
Exclude "*:\...\EA DATA. SF"
Exclude *:\...\pagefile.sys
Exclude *:\IBMBIO.COM
Exclude *:\IBMDOS.COM
Exclude *:\MSDOS.SYS
Exclude *:\IO.SYS
Exclude *:\...\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\*.*
Exclude *:\...\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\...\*

Regards
Gerrit

arhoads wrote:

> Gerrit,
>
> Does your include-exclude file exclude ~ 50,000 files?
>
> Steffan
>
> Gerrit van Zyl wrote:
> >
> > Steffan,
> >
> > Why would ADSM skip 50000 files for archiving.  Their is about 20 files that
> > gives errors (open), the rest not.
> >
> > number of objects inspected:  461,739
> > number of objects archived:   411,368
> >
> > The schedule is to archive c: d: e:
> >
> > Thanks and regards
> > Gerrit van Zyl
> >
> > arhoads wrote:
> >
> > > Gerrit,
> > >
> > > Yes.  Archive is not using the Include-Exclude list.
> > >
> > > Steffan
> > >
> > > Gerrit van Zyl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all TSM'ers,
> > > >
> > > > TSM Client 3.1.0.8 on NT
> > > > TSM Server 3.1.2.58 on AIX
> > > >
> > > > I have the following scenario and hope someone can explain this to me.
> > > > When archiving we get the following:
> > > >
> > > > 03/11/2001 03:54:57  ANE4952I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01)  Total
> > > > number of objects inspected:  461,739
> > > > 03/11/2001 03:54:57  ANE4953I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01)  Total
> > > > number of objects archived:   411,368
> > > >
> > > > When we do a incremental backup we get the following:
> > > >
> > > > 03/12/2001 22:57:23  ANE4952I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01)  Total
> > > > number of objects inspected:  410,653
> > > > 03/12/2001 22:57:23  ANE4954I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01)  Total
> > > > number of objects backed up:    3,414
> > > >
> > > > Why is there suce a huge difference between objects inspected in the two
> > > > cases (50000 objects)?  The files were not deleted!!  This is the same
> > > > everytime.
> > > >
> > > > Is archiving inspecting files differently than incremental backup?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and regards.
> > > > Gerrit van Zyl
> > > >
> > > > IT Consultant
> > > > Faritec (Pty) Ltd

--
Gerrit van Zyl
Gerrit van Zyl

IT Consultant
Faritec (Pty) Ltd

"This message may contain information which is confidential, private or
privileged in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not
peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or file which
is attached to this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, facsimile or telephone
and thereafter return and/or destroy the original message.
Any views of this communication are those of the sender except where the
sender specifically states them to be those of Faritec (Proprietary)
Limited ("Faritec") and/or Midrange Distribution Services (Pty) Ltd.
Please note that the recipient must scan this e-mail and any attached
files for viruses and the like. While we do everything possible to
protect information from viruses, Faritec accepts no liability of
whatever nature for any loss, liability, damage or expense resulting
directly or indirectly from the access and/or downloading of any files
which are attached to this e-mail message."