ADSM-L

Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small Files

2001-02-14 15:30:49
Subject: Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small Files
From: George Lesho <glesho AT AFCE DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:33:03 -0600
I believe you change the buffer pool size in the dsmserv.opt file and use an
entry as follows:
BUFPOOLSIZE 16384
The accepted way to do this is to note your current buffer pool size and then
double it. Watch your cache hit percentage
for a day or two and then double again to achieve the optimal server performance
 with should be attained when the cache
hit percentage is stable and above 99 percent...

George Lesho
Storage/System Admin
AFC Enterprises





Reinhold Wagner <rwagner AT ZEUNASTAERKER DOT DE> on 02/14/2001 10:13:43 AM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small Files



After performing the command _q db f=d_ you will see a screen like this:


          Available Space (MB): 12,000
        Assigned Capacity (MB): 12,000
        Maximum Extension (MB): 0
        Maximum Reduction (MB): 2,684
             Page Size (bytes): 4,096
            Total Usable Pages: 3,072,000
                    Used Pages: 2,377,010
                      Pct Util: 77.4
                 Max. Pct Util: 77.6
              Physical Volumes: 12
             Buffer Pool Pages: 32,768
         Total Buffer Requests: 98,257,473
                Cache Hit Pct.: 97.76
               Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00
           Backup in Progress?: No
    Type of Backup In Progress:
  Incrementals Since Last Full: 0
Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 191.43
            Percentage Changed: 2.06
Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 02/14/01 07:01:06


Look at _Cache Hit Pct._ - it should be as high as possible, we were told 98% or
 better 99%.

If it's too low you should increase the buffer pool.

Reinhold Wagner, Zeuna Staerker GmbH & Co. KG