Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape
2000-12-28 12:14:48
Thank you for the replies.
The main thing I am trying to prevent is the cancellation of the job because
of the failure of TSM
to recognize that repeated mounts of a bad tape is not going to make the
tape "all better" and usable.
The failure of the job to complete has a domino affect on subsequent
schedules. This leaves our DR
exposed because the "Copypool" data for the offsite vault is not complete.
Frank McClean
Frank_McClean AT calpers.ca DOT gov
916.658.1353
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, McClean, Frank
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, Ruddy STOUDER
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, Richard Sims
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape,
McClean, Frank <=
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, David Longo
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, McClean, Frank
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, Richard Sims
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, McClean, Frank
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, S W Branch
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, McClean, Frank
- Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, McClean , Frank [mailto:Frank_McClean
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, David Longo [mailto:David.Longo
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, Richard Sims [mailto:rbs
- Re: Repeated mount of bad scratch tape, S W Branch [mailto:swbranc
|
|
|