ADSM-L

Re: Slow Restore: 10 G in 16 hours

2015-10-04 17:29:34
Subject: Re: Slow Restore: 10 G in 16 hours
From: Mike Glassman - Admin <admin AT IAA.GOV DOT IL>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Date: 17 July 2000 14:40
>That's about the average of such a restore here.
>
>Last large restore we did, also after collation had been fixed and all,
took
>2 hours for 64MB of files (300 files).
>
>What I worked out, is that the system was flipping between tapes all the
>bloody time.
>
>I'm not now or have I ever been impressed with ADSM's restore speeds.
>
>Mike
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Raymond Chao [SMTP:Raymond.Chao AT IPAUSTRALIA.GOV DOT AU]
>> Sent: a eaie 17 2000 6:33
>> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Subject:      Slow Restore: 10 G in 16 hours
>>
>> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> cc:
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>     We had a restore from *sm (ADSM 3.1.2.55 running on AIX 4.3.2). It
>> took 16
>> hours for 10 Gig.
>>
>> It was a SAP(financial db)  restore, it took 1 hour for 4 G for the db,
>> then the
>> rest for the other files. We saw message like
>>  "mounting offline tape " and then restore files.
>>
>> We had collocation turned on in Feb 2000 which we thought would help
>> restore.
>> I believe all of our nodes have been collocated.
>> We have 18 primary storage  dltpool tapes storing  580 gig for this SAP
>> node.
>> Can anyone explain why the restore is so SLOW. Is  it  *sm or network ?
>>
>> I think  *sm smart should be enough to minimise tapes mounting when files
>> are
>> scattered across
>> a numbe(in this case 18) of tapes. Does restore have higher  priority
than
>> other
>> processes?
>>
>>
>> Any suggestions are gladly accepted .....
>>
>> Raymond Chao
>> ADSM Administration, Unix Group
>>  IPAustralia, Canberra, Austarlia
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>