Re: New ADSM Implementation
2000-05-04 08:55:27
Subject: |
Re: New ADSM Implementation |
From: |
"Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM> |
Date: |
Thu, 4 May 2000 07:55:27 -0500 |
OK, you have 3590 & library used together ? ? ?
Yes, each of my 3494 ATL's has at least 2 *SM servers and at most 4 *SM
servers
Each *SM has dedicated 3590 drives ('bout 4 per server)
Just make sure yourSCRATCH & PRIVATE categories are different for each
server in an ATL
and I went as far as to make different S & P categories for each server at a
site in case I need to (and have) moved servers from one atl to another
later,
DWight
> ----------
> From: james Healy[SMTP:bkupmstr AT YAHOO DOT COM]
> Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 7:41 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: New ADSM Implementation
>
> Is anyone out there currently sharing an IBM 3590 tape library across
> *sm's. We starting a new implementation and Our consulting team is
> recommending this method. I was wondering if anyone is trying it were
> there any problems or issues. This will be running on a solaris e10k with
> 6 domains.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
>
|
|
|