AW: Incremental Forever
2000-05-02 01:35:43
Subject: |
AW: Incremental Forever |
From: |
sal Salak Juraj <sal AT KEBA.CO DOT AT> |
Date: |
Tue, 2 May 2000 07:35:43 +0200 |
Allen,
> There is simply no technical reason to
> prefer a full/incremental scheme ...
There is one reason for not to go with incremental
backup: the restore speed.
Due to its very nature, the restore speed
will be slower comparing to restore
from full backups. (when both use same tape HW)
Depending on your requirements an environmenmt
this limitation does not necessarilly have to,
but do can apply.
best regards
Salak Juraj
KEBA AG
Softwareentwicklung Bankautomation
Gewerbepark Urfahr 14 - 16
Postfach 111
A-4041 Linz
Österreich
Tel. ++43/732/7090-7461
Fax ++43/732/730910
e-mail: sal AT keba.co DOT at
www.keba.co.at
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- AW: Incremental Forever, sal Salak Juraj
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Richard Sims
- AW: Incremental Forever, sal Salak Juraj
- AW: Incremental Forever,
sal Salak Juraj <=
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Allen S. Rout
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Diego García
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Lindsay Morris
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, France, Don (Pace)
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Nick Cassimatis
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Allen S. Rout
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Bill Smoldt
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Fred Johanson
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Lindsay Morris
- Re: AW: Incremental Forever, Fred Johanson
|
|
|