ADSM-L

Re: auditocc ??

2000-04-14 16:54:03
Subject: Re: auditocc ??
From: mailandnews <dnieuwen AT MAILANDNEWS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:54:03 -0700
Richard,

I cannot go that far back in the activity log, but yes; i had to repair some 
tapes
from the primary storagepool in the past,
so it could be a lead.

Is there any way to synchronize the primary and copy storage pool, besides 
creating a
new copypool.

Regards,
Dick

Richard Sims wrote:

> >Shouldn't the primary storagepool and the copy storagepool usage be the
> >same after a backup stg primpool copypool??
>
> Dick - From what you have evidenced it looks like somehow your primary storage
>        pool contents went away, but the copy storage pool got left behind.
>
> On 3/22, Simon Watson answered a similar question from a fellow with an empty
> primary but populated copy storage pool:
>    "I think the explanation is that the backup storage pool command copies
>    all data in the primary to the copy, that is not already found in the
>    copy.  Fullstop.  It does not reconcile the two completely.  I presume
>    this is to cater for the case where you may delete a primary volume for
>    some reason (maybe damaged) and then want to use the copy to recover
>    the primary.  If it did a reconcile then it could be disastrous if a
>    backup storage pool command was run before the recover could be
>    completed."
>
> Your Activity Log may contain evidence of what happened to the filespace or
> storage pool to account for what you're seeing.  We'd be curious to learn what
> did cause it, to understand the various circumstances under which this can 
> occur.
>
>     Richard Sims, BU
> x
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>