Re: tcpipwindowsize
2000-02-22 18:20:59
Subject: |
Re: tcpipwindowsize |
From: |
"Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM> |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:20:59 -0500 |
under /usr/lpp/adsm/bin you should find a file "options.doc" for the client
tcpwindowsize
>>--TCPWindowsize--
--window_size---------------------------------------><
Parameters
Parameters
window_size
The size you want to use, in kilobytes, for the TCP/IP sliding
window
for your client node. :p The range of values is:
UNIX, OS/2, Windows NT, and Windows 95 1 to 2048
NetWare 1 to 64
Macintosh 1 to 128
The default for UNIX, OS/2, NetWare, Windows NT, and Windows 95 is
32. The default for Macintosh is 16.
for the server just look in the file /usr/lpp/adsmserv/bin/dsmserv.opt
* Syntax
* +------------------+----------------------------------------------+
* | TCPWindowsize | window_size |
* +------------------+----------------------------------------------+
*
* Parameters
* window_size Specifies the TCP/IP windowsize in kilobytes.
* You can specify a value from 0 to 2048.
* 0 indicates that the default window size set
* for AIX should be used. Values from 1 to 2048
* indicate that the window size is in the
* range of 1K to 2M.
* The default window size is 0 which indicates
* that ADSM should accept the AIX default window
* size.
I just use "0" and let it default to what it is set under aix (on the adsm
server)
later,
DWight
> ----------
> From: Joel C McCarty[SMTP:jmccarty AT HERTZ DOT COM]
> Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 4:16 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: tcpipwindowsize
>
> Anybody have any experience setting tcpipwindowsize option. The docs
> refer
> to the "ADSM Performance Tuning Guide" for more info but I am unable to
> find this at either the IBM Redbooks site or Tivoli. By default all
> clients are setup for 16K buffers. I would like to increase this but the
> highend (2048K) returns "This size not supported by your platform -
> default size will be used". I am running ADSM 3.1.2.50 on Aix 4.3.2. Any
> ideas on a maximum setting ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joel McCarty
>
|
|
|