Re: Largest *SM DB
2000-02-03 18:50:37
Does having the largest *SM DB really make one a winner?
I would think that a *winner* would be one who has a
consistent, fully operational backup/recovery environment.
One that is readily recreated and ready to restore critical
servers in the event of disaster.
Just as Ben Bullock declared:
"Much too big for our comfort level if a disaster were to
occur or if it became corrupt and we had to run the
infamous "audit db" command"
...
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Joshua S. Bassi
Senior Technical Consultant
Symatrix Technology, Inc.
jbassi AT gloryworks DOT com
(503) 702-3371
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Largest *SM DB, Keith Nelson
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Mooney Mark
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Joshua S. Bassi
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Richard Cowen
- FW: Largest *SM DB, Keith Nelson
- Re: Largest *SM DB, bbullock
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Bill Smoldt
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Largest *SM DB,
Joshua S. Bassi <=
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Henk ten Have
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Bill Colwell
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Tab Trepagnier
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Cook, Dwight E
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Steven P Roder
- Re: Largest *SM DB, wawork Wash
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Scott Fluegge
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Tab Trepagnier
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Joshua S. Bassi
|
|
|