ADSM-L

Re: SQL-BackTrack Expiration vs ADSM Expiration

1999-10-21 13:53:44
Subject: Re: SQL-BackTrack Expiration vs ADSM Expiration
From: Fred Johanson <fred AT MIDWAY.UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 12:53:44 -0500
This is, I think, true, but the result is that ADSM has version that are
unknown to SBT, and so, unusable.  The essential option to keep ADSM and
SBT in sync is RETONLY=0.



At 01:28 PM 10/21/99 -0400, you wrote:
>I believe that ADSM rules apply. SQL-BACKTRACK simply issues delete
commands per its definitions.
>
>>>> "Glass, Peter" <Peter.K.Glass AT NORWEST DOT COM> 10/21/99 12:44PM >>>
>We have an SQL-BackTrack client who has their file expiration set for 30
>days, within SQL-BackTrack.
>The ADSM expiration rules for these backups are to keep a maximum of 10
>versions, with a 180 limit for the only backup version. SQL-BackTrack shares
>the same STANDARD management class with the majority of our clients.
>If our SQL-BackTrack backs up the same files daily, does ADSM expire them
>according to the 10 version limit, that is, after 10 days?
>Or will ADSM honor the SQL-BackTrack expiration limit of 30 days?
>If anybody can demonstrate their knowledge and expertise on this topic, they
>will have an appreciative audience.
>Thanks!
>
>Peter K. Glass
>Distributed Storage Management
>Norwest Services, Inc.
>*612-667-0086   *612-899-2776
>*<peter.k.glass AT norwest DOT com>
>
Fred Johanson
System Administrator, ADSM
S.E.A.
University of Chicago
773-702-8464
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>