ADSM-L

Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd)

2015-10-04 17:38:07
Subject: Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd)
From: Steve Harris <steveh AT WESLEY.COM DOT AU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Date: 8 October 1999 9:19
>Leo,
>
>Its my understanding from previous traffic on this list that having 3
clients on
>one machine, whilst it requires you to REGISTER three client licences, you
still
>only have to pay for one.  Do you know differently?
>
>Steve Harris
>AIX/ADSM/Oracle/HACMP Guy
>The Wesley Hospital
>Brisbane Australia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Leo Humar <lhumar AT BIGPOND.NET DOT AU> on 07/10/99 23:24:31
>
>Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To:      ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>
> cc:      (bcc: Steve Harris/Wesley)
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd)
>
>
>
>Fax to:
>
>
>
>
>G'day Ralf,
>
>We do a daily incremental and a monthly incremental with two separate
>clients on the same node.
>Files are bound to a management class and you can't change from one
MGMclass
>to the next without losing backup versions. To achieve your goal you will
>need three clients on the same node ( three client licenses).
>We are saving a lot of space on the tapes and the other benefit is when we
>have to restore a large client there are fewer tape changes required.
>
>
>Leo Humar
>LCS Pty Ltd
>lhumar AT bigpond.net DOT au
>
>No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large
>number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Masa, Ralf <masa.ralf AT COMBIBLOC DOT COM>
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>Date: 7 October 1999 16:55
>Subject: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd)
>
>
>>Thanks for your response so far...
>>
>>I will try to explain what we want to do and what we expected from ADSM to
>>do:
>>May there be a file, which changes every day, so every backup will lead to
>a
>>new active version of that file. Although we need to hold some inactive
>>versions of that file for 1 year, we do not want to hold all 365 versions
>>(we do not have the storage capacity for that...).
>>
>>If we do backups without versioning (i.e. nolimit) for example on weekdays
>>with a retention period of 7 days, at Sunday with a retention period of 30
>>days and at every 28th with a retention period of 365 days we expect, that
>>the different bindings of the inactive files (-> 7, 30 or 365 days ret.
>>per.) will never change, independent from the varying binding of the
active
>>file.
>>
>>I hope I could figure it out a little bit...
>>
>>TIA for any response
>>
>>R. Masa
>>masa.ralf AT combibloc DOT com
>
>
>
>...
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>