Re: Creating 4 Schedulers on one client

I don't have an answer to your question, but what about a different approach.
Have you looked into using the -incrbydate option for 6 days and
a full incremental on the 7th?


--
--------------------------
--------------------------
Bill Colwell
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge, Ma.
bcolwell AT draper DOT com
--------------------------
In <001601bf09f1$4d1df340$20e68ed0 AT kylepayne.binc DOT net>, on 09/28/99
In <001601bf09f1$4d1df340$20e68ed0 AT kylepayne.binc DOT net>, on 09/28/99
   at 03:37 PM, Kyle Payne <payne AT BERBEE DOT COM> said:

>ADSMers,

>        I have an NT client that has 1,200,000 + small files.  It takes 9 
> hours to
>process the directory structures (found this out from tracing).  We decided
>to create 4 separate schedule services each tied to a separate dsm.opt file.
>Each file would have different values for the domain option (we are breaking
>the box up by UNC shares).  Right now only one of the 4 scheduler services
>is getting contacted.  We want to use schedmode prompted and we want to use
>the same nodename for each scheduler service.  The server is at V3.1.2.40
>and the client is at V3.1.0.7.

>        I have 4 separate folders created under the BACLIENT folder, Scheduler 
> 1,
>Scheduler 2, Scheduler 3, and Scheduler 4.  In each I placed the 3 files
>needed in the /clientdir: optoin (dsmcsvc.exe, dscameng.txt, and dsm.opt).
>I altered each dsm.opt file to reflect different domain values.  I also
>added the CLIENTTCPPORT option and used 1511,1512,1513 and 1514
>respectively.  I ran the dsmcutil command below for each Scheduler service I
>wanted to create:

>dsmcutil install /name:"ADSM Scheduler 4 X97958" /clientdir:"C:\Program
>Files\IBM\ADSM\Baclient" /password:ADSMBKUP /autostart:Yes
>/OPTFILE:"C:\Program
>Files\IBM\ADSM\Baclient\dsm4.opt" /SCHEDLOG:"C:\Program Files\IBM\ADSM
>dsmsched4.log" /ERRORLOG:"C:\Program Files\IBM\ADSM\dsmerror4.log"

>        All 4 service were created successfully.  I went into the dsmsched.log 
> file
>for each and each had the correct next schedule.  Each was waiting to be
>contacted by the server.  The next schedule was set for 15:00.  Well 15:00
>came and went.  The only dsmsched.log file that showed it was contacted was
>dsmsched4.log.  There were no errors in any of the dsmerror.logs.

>        Now, I am debating switching to polling which I have been told works 
> but
>have not tested.  Still I would rather use prompted.  Also if you think the
>answer is different node names, well, its not I tried that and it made no
>difference.

>Thanks,
>        Kyle