ADSM-L

Antwort: Re: Adsm server 3.1.2.40, problems?

1999-08-24 11:39:40
Subject: Antwort: Re: Adsm server 3.1.2.40, problems?
From: Matthias Hensel <Matthias.Hensel AT SCHERING DOT DE>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:39:40 +0200
Ben,

do not install 3.1.2.40 when using 3590E drives !

the 3.1.2.22 service of ADSM is enough to run 3590E drives. And in my
opinion is the onliest service to run with these new drives. When we
upgraded to 3.1.2.40 the server did not work with the drives anymore and
also migrating back to 3.1.2.22 was no workaraound, since this level
updates 3590 volumes as being DLT volumes after the first usage (so IBM lab
was saying). So you are not able to access these tapes anymore since ADSM
requires an DLT drive, which is not installed and therefore cancels (i.e.)
restore session issuing "data unavailable to server". You are NOT able to
do proper restores ! Imagine !! With a backup server !

ADSM Lab is working with prio1 at this problem.

Matthias





bbullock <bbullock AT MICRON DOT COM> am 24.08.99 16:59:42

Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


An:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Kopie:     (Blindkopie: Matthias Hensel/BE/USR/SHG)


Thema:    Re: Adsm server 3.1.2.40, problems?





        Oh Richard, you strike fear in my soul. I too am running 6 ADSM
servers on various versions of AIX. I  need to upgrade to version 3.1.2.40
to use the new 3590E tape drives. I have upgraded 3 so far and have been
monitoring the expire inventory for just these types of problems. So far
(knock on wood), all my servers on 3.1.2.40 seem to be working fine. My
questions for you would be:

Did the expire inventory problem show up immediately after the upgrade?
Does there seem to be a common factor on the servers with the problem? (DB
size, OS version)
Any idea why your other 3 servers are working properly with this ADSM
version?

        I'd really like to avoid the grief you are going through if
possible.

Thanks,
Ben
Micron Technology Inc,
Boise, ID

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bates, Richard [mailto:Richard.Bates AT VERTEX.CO DOT UK]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 3:20 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Adsm server 3.1.2.40, problems?
>
>
> We have 7 ADSM servers all running a mix of AIX 4.1.5 and 4.3.
> We have been at 3.1.2.40 for about a week or so.  4 of our
> servers are having big problems with expiration. For example
> on one server expiration ran for about 3 days and processed just
> a handful of objects. We can not cancel the expiration process
> with either "can pro" or "cancel expiration".
>
> As a result, our database is getting bigger and bigger!!
>
> We have a call open with IBM,  who inform us that there is
> an APAR (ic24611) which references this exact problem - but
> on Sun Solaris.
>
> Not sure whether any other platforms are affected.
>
> Sigh!
> Richard.
>
> =====================================
> Technical Services (ADSM) - Dawson House
> Int: 33298  Ext: 01925 233298
> =====================================
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Toora, Kuli [SMTP:kulbinder.toora AT MEB.CO DOT UK]
> > Sent: 23 August 1999 16:32
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      Re: Adsm server 3.1.2.40, problems?
> >
> > We plan to install the code on a test system and run it
> there for a while
> > until we are happy that there are no problems.
> > I will post any findings.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kuli.
> >
> > Kulbinder Toora
> > 01384 296191 x3498
> > e-mail - Kulbinder.toora AT meb.co DOT uk
> > NPEC (National Power Energy Company)
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
> [SMTP:Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 4:01 PM
> > > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > > Subject:      Adsm server 3.1.2.40, problems?
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > has anyone already installed or upgraded to adsm 3.1.2.40
> under OS/390 ?
> > >
> > > If yes, what are the problem you ever met?
> > > I wonder if it is now time to run this new code, we need
> it for the long
> > > name support of Netware clients.
> > > Any advices would be appreciated...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Rene Lambelet
> > > Nestec SA - 55, Av. Nestle - CH-1800 Vevey
> > > Tel: ++41'21'924'35'43 / Fax: ++41'21'924'45'89
> > > E-Mail: rene.lambelet AT nestle DOT com
> > >
> > > ================================================================
> > >
> > > This incoming e-mail (and any attachments) has been
> checked at MEB,
> > > and has been found to be clean from any virus infection
> > > (using Sophos SAVI 3.24 and Dr Solomon's v7.96).
> > >
> > > Virus queries - Tech Support (09 3521)
> > > E-mail system - External Postmaster (09 3673)
> > >
> > > ================================================================
> > ================================================================
> >
> > This outgoing e-mail (and any attachments) has been checked
> > (using Sophos SAVI 3.24 and Dr Solomon's v7.96) before leaving us
> > (UK 01384 296191), and has been found to be clean from any virus
> > infection.
> >
> > Virus queries - PC Tech Support (09 3521)
> > E-mail system - External Postmaster (09 3673).
> >
> > ================================================================
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
>
> www.mimesweeper.com
> **********************************************************************
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>